Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DF8BC31.6020105@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/14/2011 11:01 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > You might remember we added a postmaster/postgres -b switch to indicate > binary upgrade mode. The attached patch prevents any client without an > application_name of 'binary-upgrade' from connecting to the cluster > while it is binary upgrade mode. This helps prevent unauthorized users > from connecting during the upgrade. This will not help for clusters > that do not have the -b flag, e.g. pre-9.1. > > Does this seem useful? Something for 9.1 or 9.2? > > This idea came from Andrew Dunstan via IRC during a pg_upgrade run by > Stephen Frost when some clients accidentally connected. (Stephen reran > pg_upgrade successfully.) > What I actually had in mind was rather different: an HBA mechanism based on appname. But on second thoughts maybe the protocol wouldn't support that. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: