Re: procpid?
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DF76026020000250003E61D@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: procpid?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > Doing this presumes the existence of a large number of tools where > the author is unlikely to be keeping up with PostgreSQL > development. I don't believe that theorized set of users actually > exists. There could be a number of queries used for monitoring or administration which will be affected. Just on our Wiki pages we have some queries available for copy/paste which would need multiple versions while both column names were in supported versions of the software: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_dependency_information http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Backend_killer_function I agree that these are manageable, but not necessarily trivial. (You should see how long it can take to get them to install new monitoring software to our centralized system here.) I think that's consistent with the "save up our breaking changes to do them all at once" approach. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: