Re: procpid?
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: procpid? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4DF4131D.5020003@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: procpid?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> There is a difference between a project name and something that directly >> affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid >> column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months >> to communicate the change. > Uh, I am the first one I remember complaining about this so I don't see > why we should break compatibility for such a low-level problem. > Because it is a very real problem with an easy fix. We have 18 months to publicize that fix. I mean really? This is a no-brainer. JD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: