Re: procpid?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DF3A7E2.3020305@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: procpid?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/11/2011 1:02 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasby<jim@nasby.net> wrote: >> It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of creating a pid column that has the same data so wecan deprecate >> procpid and eventually remove it... > well, if we will start changing bad picked names we will have a *lot* > of work to do... starting by the project's name ;) There is a difference between a project name and something that directly affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months to communicate the change. Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: