Re: PostgreSQL Magazine #00 is out ! Send feedback please !
От | damien clochard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Magazine #00 is out ! Send feedback please ! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DF11956.4020906@dalibo.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Magazine #00 is out ! Send feedback please ! (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Le 09/06/2011 18:45, Greg Smith a écrit : > damien clochard wrote: >> My intention is provide advocacy material to local user groups in the >> form of a classy and eye-catching magazine. > > And you succeeded at that, no question. And the idea of having a > magazine to give out, instead of the usual boring stuff, is an > interesting one. > > There's a disconnect between where you're at and where I'm at here now > though, one that this whole discussion highlights. I'd rather see > something that's possible to produce in quantity, around the world, as a > more important priority than optimizing for "classy and eye-catching" at > the expense of other practical constraints. I think the PostgreSQL > community might be better served by something less ambitious, > graphically, that was easier to print on a global scale. I really > appreciate the work you put into targeting print magazine levels of > polish for the design of #00. I just don't think that's a sustainable > nor necessary quality level for a PUG/booth magazine to target in the > future. It's hard enough to get useful magazine-style content produced > on any regular schedule. If it's got to be graphically intense and it > ends up being challenging to distribute, too, you may have made the > requirements too hard to accomplish. > You put the debate in a nutshell ! Indeed, there is a strategic choice : being Flashy vs. being Universal ;-) For the demo issue, i wanted to go as far as i could with my little knowledge of Scribus... This was a kind of Proof of Concept. Now we know what we can get. The question is "do we need such a graphical complexity ?". This is a great debate. A long one ! There's lot of parameters to consider : the difference of paper format of course but also more generic arguments. For example i guess it also depends on the economic model we will build. If we can have sponsors that are ok to pay for an high-end magazine, why limiting ourselves ? Anyway who can do more, can do less :-) In the end, if we decide that the priority is to make an easily printable magazine, that won't be a problem... -- damien clochard dalibo.com | dalibo.org
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: