Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DEE78F1020000250003E2B4@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 07.06.2011 21:10, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> I think that leaves me with all the answers I need to get a new >> patch out this evening (U.S. Central Time). > > Great, I'll review it in my morning (in about 12h) Attached. Passes all the usual regression tests I run, plus light ad hoc testing. All is working fine as far as this patch itself goes, although more testing is needed to really call it sound. If anyone is interested in the differential from version 3 of the patch, it is the result of these two commits to my local repo: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=018b0fcbeba05317ba7066e552efe9a04e6890d9 http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc651e2721a601ea806cf6e5d53d0676dfd26dca During testing I found two annoying things not caused by this patch which should probably be addressed in 9.1 if feasible, although I don't think they rise to the level of blockers. More on those in separate threads. -Kevin
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: