Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DEE1C9A020000250003E27D@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > It makes me a bit uncomfortable to do catalog cache lookups while > holding all the lwlocks. I think I've caught up with the rest of the class on why this isn't sane in DropAllPredicateLocksFromTableImpl, but I wonder about CheckTableForSerializableConflictIn. We *do* expect to be throwing errors in here, and we need some way to tell whether an index is associated with a particular heap relation. Is the catalog cache the right way to check that here, or is something else more appropriate? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: