max_connections proposal
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | max_connections proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DDDC1CD.3010600@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: max_connections proposal
Re: max_connections proposal Re: max_connections proposal Re: max_connections proposal |
Список | pgsql-general |
There might be a very cheap and simple way to help reduce the number of people running into problems because they set massive max_connections values that their server cannot cope with instead of using pooling. In the default postgresql.conf, change: max_connections = 100 # (change requires restart) # Note: Increasing max_connections costs ~400 bytes of shared memory # per connection slot, plus lock space (see max_locks_per_transaction). to: max_connections = 100 # (change requires restart) # WARNING: If you're about to increase max_connections above 100, you # should probably be using a connection pool instead. See: # http://wiki.postgresql.org/max_connections # # Note: Increasing max_connections costs ~400 bytes of shared memory # per connection slot, plus lock space (see max_locks_per_transaction). # ... where wiki.postgresql.org/max_connections (which doesn't yet exist) explains the throughput costs of too many backends and the advantages of configuring a connection pool instead. Sure, this somewhat contravenes the "users don't read - ever" principle, but we can hope that _some_ people will read a comment immediately beside the directive they're modifying. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: