Re: question about readonly instances
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: question about readonly instances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DD4C12D.3040105@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: question about readonly instances (Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: question about readonly instances
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/18/11 11:39 PM, Szymon Guz wrote: > > thanks for the answer. It is not a problem to have 3 oracle instances, > in fact there will be hundreds of them probably, but could also be > hundreds of Postgres instances :) do you have any idea how EXPENSIVE 100s of Oracle RAC nodes are annually? to share block storage between cluster nodes requires a cluster-aware file system, as conventional file systems do not expect the disk files to change behind their back. these cluster-aware file systems have a bunch of overhead in maintaining cache coherency between nodes, and such. as far as I know, postgres can not be run on a read only file system, further its shared_buffer caches couldn't possibly be aware of other nodes modifying blocks that happen to be cached.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: