Re: [BUGS] BUG #14639: Different xmin values in a transaction
От | Ray Warren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14639: Different xmin values in a transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DD2043D33498E4B82FF57B256C47540D52001@ex-04.aam.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14639: Different xmin values in a transaction (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Andres, I care about xmin values because we have a very high number of inserts/updates/deletes and we get a Vacuum Freeze (from autovacuum)occurring every few days so I want to reduce that happening. The application is doing inserts in batches so Iexpected to see batches with the same xmin. When I found they were all different I then identified what I thought was anissue with the partition function. We can work around it but I wasn't expecting this behaviour. Regards ... Ray -----Original Message----- From: Andres Freund [mailto:andres@anarazel.de] Sent: 02 May 2017 17:13 To: Ray Warren Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14639: Different xmin values in a transaction On 2017-05-02 15:57:39 +0000, ray.warren@artsalliancemedia.com wrote: > Under certain conditions inserts in the same transaction are getting > different xmin values. > A reproducible example is below. I can work around it but I think this > is a bug. That's to be expected if you use savepoints (and EXCEPTION blocks use those internally). Why do you care about xmin value? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: