Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
От | Darren Duncan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DCF7D0C.9000108@darrenduncan.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DOMAINs and CASTs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote: >> First of all, what if "cast(timestamp as int)" was already defined? Which >> cast then would you expect to be invoked here? >> >> '1800-01-01 00:00:00'::int > > i will expect an error in that case... what you're doing there is > casting an "unknown" to integer, for that to be valid you need an > intermediate cast to timestamp or in my case to datetime Sorry, my bad; I meant to say (might be slightly misspelled): ('1800-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamp)::int Now, since all values of a DOMAIN are also values of the base type the DOMAIN is defined as being a subset of, then the sub-expression within the parenthesis denotes a value that is both a timestamp and a datetime at the same time. So, if a generic "CAST(timestamp as int)" is already defined, and you define a "CAST(datetime as int)", then what should the above code (correct for misspelling) do, or should it fail? -- Darren Duncan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: