Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype
| От | Darren Duncan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4DC47416.6020204@darrenduncan.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
To follow-up, an additional feature that would be useful and resembles union types is the variant where you could declare a union type first and then separately other types could declare they are a member of the union. I'm talking about loosely what mixins or type-roles or interfaces etc are in other languages. The most trivial example would be declaring an ENUM-alike first and then separately declaring the component values where the latter declare they are part of the ENUM, and this could make it easier to add or change ENUM values. But keep in mind that this is a distinct concept from what we're otherwise talking about as being union types. -- Darren Duncan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: