Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DC43EC4.10904@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Browne wrote: > I'm getting "paper cuts" quite a bit these days over the differences > between what different packaging systems decide to install. The one > *I* get notably bit on, of late, is that I have written code that > expects to have pg_config to do some degree of self-discovery, only to > find production folk complaining that they only have "psql" available > in their environment. > Given the other improvements in being able to build extensions in 9.1, we really should push packagers to move pg_config from the PostgreSQL development package into the main one starting in that version. I've gotten bit by this plenty of times. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: