Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
От | Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DC299B7.4090807@free.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory (damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/05/2011 14:29, damien clochard wrote: > Le 04/05/2011 13:38, Roy Hann a écrit : >> Joshua Berkus wrote: >> >>> When doing PR, it's more important to use terms people recognize than to use >>> terms which are perfectly accurate. Nobody expects a news article to >>> be perfectly accurate anyway. >>> >>> However, I posted this because I think that several folks in the community feel >>> that this is going too far into the land of marketese, and I want to >>> hash it out and get consensus before we start pitching 9.1 final. >> >> Call 'em table-valued variables. >> > > How about "Volatile Tables" ? > > It makes it pretty clear that you cannot put valuable data in it. > In the same time the word implies that the tables are gonna be faster > than standard tables (like volatile memory being faster Disk storage) Yeah, but volatile means « lost on shutdown », which is not the case here during a clean shutdown. > Plus it's easy to translate in French :P
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: