Re: A small step towards more organized beta testing
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A small step towards more organized beta testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DC064A9.8090509@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A small step towards more organized beta testing (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: A small step towards more organized beta testing
Re: A small step towards more organized beta testing |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> Are we really running a Google spreadsheet as in effect a bug tracker? > > And why are we so inistant on not posting bug reports to pgsql-bugs? We're not. However: a) pgsql-bugs doesn't help us to get all of the various test information without a lot of back-and-forth with the submitter (platform, version, install method, test run, etc.) b) pgsql-bugs is for failures only, and not for successful tests, and we need successful tests as well to know how we're doing. However, that does suggest that having the eventual test report app (working on it), post failures to pgsql-bugs on some kind of moderated basis. BTW, if anyone knows of a specific *testing* application out there which handles user testing, then please speak up before I write one. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: