Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
От | damien clochard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DC00C4E.5080305@dalibo.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Le 03/05/2011 15:49, Dave Page a écrit : > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:24:53 am Dave Page wrote: >>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>>> So far: >>>> >>>> http://www.cio.com.au/article/384968/open_source_postgresql_9_1_beta_rele >>>> ased/ >>>> >>>> http://lwn.net/Articles/440666/ (subscriber-only content) >>>> >>>> http://www.databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3932351/Po >>>> stgreSQL-91-Gets-Synchronous.htm >>> >>> I have to wonder why these mention PGXN given that at the moment it's >>> just a download site, providing similar functionality to software >>> catalog on www.postgresql.org. >>> >>> When there is a command line client available, then sure, it should be >>> promoted, but until then it's a WIP (I would say vapourware, but I >>> that seems unfair, as I know David certainly is working on it). >> >> Well the same could be said about SQL/MED and SE-postgres, both new items at the >> just getting started stage:) > > Putting aside the fact that Damien pointed out that the PGXN website > is out of date (and therefore so is my information on the lack of a > cli), no, those are not the same. The code for both projects is there > in 9.1 and can be used for production applications. Those two features > are in no way vapourware, nor are they a WIP, at least as far as the > feature set for this release is concerned. > Dave, I don't understand your last sentence. Are you still thinking that PGXN client is vaporware or WIP ? Personnaly, I think PGXN will be available for production server after some beta tests. Just like SQL/MED and SE-postgres. I don't see why you are being so harsh on PGXN. Frankly i don't understand your point. While we're encouraging people to test the 9.1beta1 why not pointing them the PGXN project, as it needs beta testers too ? In fact when you're testing PGXN, you're also testing PostgreSQL Extensions, right ? ;-) -- damien clochard dalibo.com | dalibo.org
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: