Re: pervasiveness of surrogate (also called synthetic) keys
От | Rob Sargent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pervasiveness of surrogate (also called synthetic) keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DBF8B39.5030908@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pervasiveness of surrogate (also called synthetic) keys (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pervasiveness of surrogate (also called synthetic)
keys
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Craig Ringer wrote: > On 03/05/11 11:07, Greg Smith wrote: > > >> That doesn't mean you can't use >> them as a sort of foreign key indexing the data; it just means you can't >> make them the sole unique identifier for a particular entity, where that >> entity is a person, company, or part. >> > > Classic case: a database here has several tables indexed by MAC address. > It's used for asset reporting and software inventory. > > Problem: VMs generate random MAC addresses by default. They're not > guaranteed to be globally unique. Collisions have happened and will > probably happen again. In this case, it wasn't a big deal, but it just > goes to show that even the "obviously" globally unique isn't necessarily so. > > -- > Craig Ringer > Hm.. Virtual machines as assets. Mortgage backed securities, anyone.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: