Re: unknown conversion %m

On 04/28/2011 12:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  writes:
>> What I'm thinking of doing is to set up something like:
>>      #define PG_PRINTF_CHECK __printf__
> BTW, gcc 2.95.3 documents "printf", and not "__printf__".
> Suggest not including the underscores, since that's apparently a
> johnny-come-lately spelling.  It's not like any of this construct
> is even faintly portable to non-gcc compilers anyway ...
>

Yeah, I think that the underscore variants got added because of cases 
like ours where printf is sometimes defined as a macro. I'll just need 
to make sure that this gets set before there's any possibility of that 
happening.

cheers

andrew