Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DB04D57.7020309@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/21/2011 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >>> I think to really address that problem, you need to think about shorter >>> release cycles overall, like every 6 months. Otherwise, the current 12 >>> to 14 month horizon is just too long psychologically. >> I agree. I am in favor of a shorter release cycle. > I'm not. I don't think there is any demand among *users* (as opposed to > developers) for more than one major PG release a year. It's hard enough > to get people to migrate that often. I agree. > Another problem is that if you halve the release interval, you either > double the amount of work spent on maintaining back branches, or halve > the support lifetime of a branch. Neither of those is attractive. I *really* *really* agree. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: