Re: Windows build issues
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows build issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DA44AED.9010103@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows build issues (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows build issues
Re: Windows build issues |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/12/2011 08:23 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 22:16, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> On tor, 2011-04-07 at 16:20 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> It sure would be nice if someone would write a doc patch, or at least >>> a wiki page, explaining all the permutations here... I get the >>> impression it's not that hard to set up if you are reasonable >>> comfortable working in a Windows environment, but it's pretty >>> intimidating if you aren't. >> Here's a patch I came up with that matches my experience, but evidently >> there could be many others. > Have we shown for sure that you can't build it with the compiler > that's in the SDK? If not, I still think that should be our primary > option - I certainly don't see how it's obsolete. (and you can, > afaics, still get the platform sdk with the correct version of the > compiler (non-vs2010), but I haven't tested it) > > Or did I miss something in this thread? > I haven't actually tried using the SDK alone. I'll try testing that on a cloud appliance when I get a chance, as I'm out of Windows boxes I can reasonable perturb. I do know you *need* the SDK for 64 bit builds with VSE 2008, as it doesn't include a 64 bit compiler. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: