Re: Another swing at JSON
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another swing at JSON |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D935C89.4040306@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Another swing at JSON (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Another swing at JSON
Re: Another swing at JSON |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/30/2011 12:29 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> I think we're pretty much down to only fixing bugs now, for 9.1, and this >> isn't a bug, however inconvenient it might be. > It's not just inconvenient, it's setting a bad example for people to > work on their own extensions. It's more than unfortunate. I will > prepare a doc patch, but copying from contrib is the usual way to go > creating your own extension, right? > > None of that makes it a bug. I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib Makefiles telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this stage of the cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an idea from the top of my head. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: