Re: JDBC gripe list

Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:

> it would be done in a transaction otherwise what is the point ?

That's a fair question.  A batch will almost always run faster if
done as a single transaction which either runs in its entirety or
fails in its entirety.  What is the reason for wanting to use batch
processing if not for speed?  I think we need to see a reasonable
use case from someone advocating this change in order to justify it.
(Note: "It works in MySQL" won't cut it.)

-Kevin