Re: JDBC gripe list
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC gripe list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D91FF7A020000250003BEFB@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC gripe list (Quartz <quartz12h@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC gripe list
Re: JDBC gripe list |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Quartz <quartz12h@yahoo.com> wrote: > "... the driver's behavior must be consistent with a particular > DBMS, either always continuing to process commands or never > continuing to > process commands.,," > "The possible implementations and return values have been modified > in the Java 2 SDK, Standard Edition, version 1.3 to accommodate > the option of continuing to proccess commands in a batch update > after a BatchUpdateException obejct has been thrown. " Unfortunately, the combination of these two requirements with the fact that the PostgreSQL driver supports JDK 1.2 or higher means that this option must not be allowed. We'd have to require a Java version from this century to support that. Maybe it's time to think about that, but we would need to commit to that before we could move to the behavior you want. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: