Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D837EA2.2070205@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient
transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18.03.2011 16:52, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Simon Riggs<simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > >> In PostgreSQL other users cannot observe the commit until an >> acknowledgement has been received. > > Really? I hadn't picked up on that. That makes for a lot of > complication on crash-and-recovery of a master, but if we can pull > it off, that's really cool. If we do that and MySQL doesn't, we > definitely don't want to use the same terminology they do, which > would imply the same behavior. To be clear: other users cannot observe the commit until standby acknowledges it - unless the master crashes while waiting for the acknowledgment. If that happens, the commit will be visible to everyone after recovery. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: