Re: Unused indices
От | Shaun Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unused indices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D66B340.40307@peak6.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unused indices (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 02/24/2011 12:13 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > That's not quite the right filter. You want to screen out > everything that isn't a unique index, not just the primary key ones. > You probably can't drop any of those without impacting database > integrity. Ah yes. I was considering adding the clause for unique indexes. Filthy constraint violations. > Also, as a picky point, you really should use functions like > pg_relation_size instead of doing math on relpages. You know, I always think about that, but I'm essentially lazy. :) I personally haven't ever had the old *8 trick fail, but from your perspective of working with so many variations, I could see how you'd want to avoid it. I'll be good from now on. ;) -- Shaun Thomas OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604 312-676-8870 sthomas@peak6.com ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php for terms and conditions related to this email
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: