Re: Named restore points
От | Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Named restore points |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D667932.5010606@timbira.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Named restore points (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Named restore points
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em 08-02-2011 17:35, Thom Brown escreveu: > This could do with a bit more documentation about usage. Below the > Backup Control Functions table > (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-ADMIN-BACKUP-TABLE), > each function has a paragraph detailing what it does. > I forgot to check it. > Also, I notice you can easily write over a label. The case I'm > thinking of is someone in psql creating a named restore point, then > later on, they go in again, accidentally cursor up and select the > previous statement and create it again. Would this mean that the > previous label is lost, or would it be the case that any subsequent > duplicate labels would have no effect unless the WAL files with the > original label in were consumed? In either case, a note in the docs > about this would be useful. > This is a limitation that I pointed out [1] but people decided to postpone named restore point management. The first one is used as restore point. I added it in the attached patch. > And I don't see these label creations getting logged either. Could we > output that to the log because at least then users can grep the > directory for labels, and, in most cases, the time they occurred? > Good point. I included location instead of time; time is already supplied by log file. The following patch implements the Thom's suggestions. [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D48209C.7050109@timbira.com -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: