Re: Correctly producing array literals for prepared statements
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Correctly producing array literals for prepared statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D657306.3060304@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Correctly producing array literals for prepared statements (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Correctly producing array literals for prepared statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/23/2011 02:21 PM, Andrew Chernow wrote: > >> Binary mode had serious limitations, such as portability. >> > > What are the other limitations? > > As far as portability is concerned, we are using it on many different > operating systems and architectures without issue. Even our most > recent bump to 9.0.1 and 9.0.3 was flawless in regard to > libpq/libpqtypes. It's probably fine if you can control both ends. But there is no guarantee of portability, nor does it seem likely to me there ever will be, so I don't find your assertion terribly useful. The fact that it hasn't broken for you doesn't mean it can't or won't be. The other downside I see is that binary protocols are often a lot harder to debug, but maybe that's just me. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: