Questions about octal vs. hex for bytea
| От | Reuven M. Lerner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Questions about octal vs. hex for bytea |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D60FB7D.4090201@lerner.co.il обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Questions about octal vs. hex for bytea
Re: Questions about octal vs. hex for bytea Re: Questions about octal vs. hex for bytea Re: Questions about octal vs. hex for bytea |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, everyone. I've got a client who is planning to upgrade from PostgreSQL 8.3 to 9.0 in the coming weeks. They use a lot of tables with bytea columns. They're worried about the switch from octal to hex formats for bytea data. Based on everything I know and have read, the change is only for external representations, for input and output. Output is now by default in hex, but can be changed with a parameter (bytea_output) that provides backward compatibility. Input can be in either octal or hex, with no changes needed. My client is concerned that the internal representation has changed, and is asking me for a script that will change the representation, in order to save space (since hex occupies less space than octal). I'm not aware of such a need, or even the possibility for this to be done; even if the internal representation has changed, it'll be handled in the upgrade process, and doesn't need to be done with anything external. So I've told them that I don't think that anything is necessary for either input or output, except (perhaps) to set bytea_output in its backward-compatibility mode. But I wanted to check with people here, just to double-check my understanding. Thanks in advance, Reuven -- Reuven M. Lerner -- Web development, consulting, and training Mobile: +972-54-496-8405 * US phone: 847-230-9795 Skype/AIM: reuvenlerner
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: