Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D60122A.2060505@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/19/2011 01:42 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 02:35:42PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> /* Get the OpenSSL structure associated with a connection. Returns NULL for >>> * unencrypted connections or if any other TLS library is in use. */ >>> extern void *PQgetssl(PGconn *conn); >>> >>> We are under no compulsion to emulate OpenSSL if we switch to another >>> library. The design intent is that we'd provide a separate function >>> (PQgetnss?) and callers that know how to use that library would call >>> that function. If they don't, it's not our problem. >> Who uses this? ODBC? > There's a few users, that I can find anyway. psql is one. It uses this > to get information about the connection, pgadmin does it also for a > similar reasons I guess. > > Adding a seperate function for each SSL library seems odd. It would > mean that psql would need the headers to every possible SSL library > because it (in theory) doesn't know which library might be used at > runtime. I don't see why. If you plug in a libpq that was compiled against, say, NSS under a psql that's expecting OpenSSL you'll get a null back instead of a pointer to an SSL object, but then that would be a silly thing to do. > ODBC uses it as well. It really uses it for communication. As far as > Google Code Search can it's the only one that does. > > But if the intention is to do it by adding new functions, we can and > let the ODBC guys sort it out (ERROR: Using incompatable SSL > connection). > > Yeah. It might make sense to have a library function that tells the client what SSL library is being used. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: