Re: updated patch for foreach stmt

On 02/15/2011 08:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>  wrote:
>> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  writes:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Frost<sfrost@snowman.net>  wrote:
>>>> Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to
>>>> see it included.
>>> Amen to that!
>>> I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY
>>> arr rather than just FOREACH thingy IN arr.
>> Actually, I'm on record as saying the opposite: we shouldn't need to
>> distinguish the exact data type at the syntax level, so long as the
>> FOREACH construct is understood to mean "iterate through the members of
>> the composite object produced by this expression":
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg01579.php
>>
>> I am not, however, wedded to that position --- if people are happier
>> with explicit use of ARRAY here, I won't fight hard to get rid of it.
>>
>> Anyway I'm going to start on this patch next, so last chance for
>> opinions about the syntax ...
> Oh, I was looking at this one:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg01557.php
>
> Anyhoo, forcing the explicit ARRAY keyword in there seems like pretty
> cheap future-proofing to me.  YMMV.
>


If this is the syntax that makes you do things like:
    FOREACH foo IN ARRAY ARRAY[1,2,3]


I have to say I find that pretty darn ugly still.


cheers

andrew