Re: review: FDW API

On 15.02.2011 21:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>  wrote:
>> I'm actually surprised we don't need to distinguish them in more places, but
>> nevertheless it feels like we should have that info available more
>> conveniently, and without requiring a catalog lookup like get_rel_relkind()
>> does. At first I thought we should add a field to RelOptInfo, but that
>> doesn't help transformLockingClause. Adding the field to RangeTblEntry seems
>> quite invasive, and it doesn't feel like the right place to cache that kind
>> of information anyway. Thoughts on that?
>
> Maybe it should be a new RTEKind.

That would be even more invasive.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com