Re: SSI patch version 14
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSI patch version 14 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D4D61FF020000250003A479@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SSI patch version 14 ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSI patch version 14
Re: SSI patch version 14 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" wrote: > So now that I'm sure we actually do need code there, I'll add it. In working on this I noticed the apparent need to move two calls to PredicateLockTuple a little bit to keep them inside the buffer lock. Without at least a share lock on the buffer, it seems that here is a window where a read could miss the MVCC from a write and the write could fail to see the predicate lock. Please see whether this seems reasonable: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=7841a22648c3f4ae46f674d7cf4a7c2673cf9ed2 > And I'll add the new test to the isolation suite. We don't need all permutations for this test, which is a good thing since it has such a long setup time. Is there an easy way to just run the one schedule of statements on three connections? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: