Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
От | Mladen Gogala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D4B2E8A.7010402@vmsinfo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... (Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Maciek Sakrejda wrote: >> The hints are there because they are definitely needed. Yet, there is a >> religious zeal and a fatwa against them. >> > > The opposition is philosophical, not "religious". There is no "fatwa". > If you want a serious discussion, avoid inflammatory terms. > > > I don't want to insult anybody but the whole thing does look strange. Maybe we can agree to remove that ridiculous "we don't want hints" note from Postgresql wiki? That would make it look less like , hmph, philosophical issue and more "not yet implemented" issue, especially if we have in mind that hints are already here, in the form of "enable_<method>" switches. -- Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA 1500 Broadway New York, NY 10036 (212) 329-5251 http://www.vmsinfo.com The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: