Re: Patch to support SSL certificate connections
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to support SSL certificate connections |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D42805B.2060002@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to support SSL certificate connections (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch to support SSL certificate connections
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 28/01/2011 09:21, Dave Page a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Le 28/01/2011 02:11, Dave Page a écrit : >>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>> Le 22/01/2011 01:34, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >>>>> Le 21/01/2011 10:17, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 23:08, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>>>>> Le 19/01/2011 00:35, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This patch adds support to specify SSL certificate files and to connect >>>>>>>> according to those. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's pretty straightforward: four file pickers to handle on dlgServer, >>>>>>>> and changes in the connection code to add those parameters in the >>>>>>>> connection string. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A screenshot attached so that you can see the UI without building pgAdmin :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Comments? >>>>>> >>>>>> I would move root cert up before the others. Also CRL. >>>>>> >>>>>> Root cert and CRL are about validating the *server* certificate. Key >>>>>> and cert file are about SSL authentication of the *client* (thus >>>>>> *client* certificates). They should definitely be in that order - >>>>>> perhaps even grouped with a headline? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Done for moving widgets. Not sure grouped widgets could make sense here. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Here is what I finally managed to do. Comments? >>> >>> Why the change from the standard layout used everywhere else? >>> >> >> Because Magnus asked for that kind of design? (grouped with a headline) > > He suggested it, but that doesn't mean it has to be done. If we're > going to break the property dialog design guidelines and start laying > things out in new formats we need to be *really* careful to avoid > getting in an inconsistent mess. > Yeah, I know. And "grouped with a headline" doesn't mean we have to use a wxStaticBoxSizer. Anyway, reading your comments and Ashesh's comments, I will drop the wxStaticBoxSizer and everyone will be happy: * no strange issue on MacOSX for Ashesh * no weird design for you * but still first server certificate and then client certificate for Magnus. Will try to work on this today. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: