Re: Caution when removing git branches
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Caution when removing git branches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D404DB8.9020208@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Caution when removing git branches (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Caution when removing git branches
Re: Caution when removing git branches |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/26/2011 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy > to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on > my github repository using: > > $ git branch -d :branch_name > > I don't believe that is revertable. What is scarey is that this could > be done on our 'origin' as well. > The ability to remove branches is a feature. I strongly encourage you to create topic branches for development work, then merge them onto the main branch, and then delete them. I almost never work directly on, say, REL9_0_STABLE or master, except for quite trivial changes. I thought we had some hooks on gitmaster to help prevent accidents like inadvertent branch deletion. I at least still keep rolling backups of the main repo. I'm sure I'm not alone. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: