Re: Add support for logging the current role
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add support for logging the current role |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D310D9D.90900@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add support for logging the current role (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add support for logging the current role
Re: Add support for logging the current role |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/14/2011 09:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost<sfrost@snowman.net> writes: >> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >>> A user-settable column list seems pretty on-target >>> for solving those problems to me. >> I'm looking into implementing this. >> An interesting initial question is- should the users be able to control >> the *order* of the columns? My gut feeling, if we're giving them a GUC >> that's a list of fields, is 'yes', but I'm happy to listen to other >> thoughts. > Yeah, I was just thinking about that in connection with the suggestion > of using a bitmap as the pre-parsed representation (which would more or > less force adoption of the fixed-column-order approach). I really think > we can't get away with that. Remember what Andrew pointed out upthread: > it's important to be able to load the csvlog output directly into a > table without any extra processing. Suppose a DBA is logging columns > A,B,D and he later realizes that logging C would be a good thing too. > He's going to have to ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN to add C to his logging > table ... and now it's at the end. This is no problem if he can set the > GUC to be "A,B,D,C" and have the field order be honored. Otherwise he's > got a problem. Ok, you sold me. Until I read this I was inclined to say not, on KISS principles. The only thing I'd suggest extra is that we might allow "version_n_m" as shorthand for the default table layout from the relevant version. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: