Re: SSI patch version 8
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSI patch version 8 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D2F13FD.3070009@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSI patch version 8 ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSI patch version 8
Re: SSI patch version 8 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.01.2011 16:51, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Right. As each tuple is read we need to ensure that there is a > predicate lock to cover it. Since finer-grained locks can be > combined into coarser-grained locks we need to start with the fine > grained and move toward checking the coarser grains, to avoid > missing a lock during promotion. So for each tuple we calculate a > hash, find a partition, lock it, and lookup the tuple as a lock > target. When that's not found we do the same thing for the page. > When that's not found we do the same thing for the relation. > > But we acquired a relation lock up front, when we determined that > this would be a heap scan, so we could short-circuit this whole > thing if within the heapgettup_pagemode function we could determine > that this was a scan of the whole relation. That sounds simple enough. Add a boolean field to HeapScanDesc, "rs_relpredicatelocked", and set it when you acquire the relation lock. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: