Re: Database selector
От | Erwin Brandstetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database selector |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D2A81FF.3040508@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Database selector (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Database selector
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On 06.01.2011 12:23, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Le 28/12/2010 20:18, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : >> (...) >> Testing v.1.12.1 (Dec 13 2010, rev: REL-1_12_2) on Windows XP Pro, SP3 >> To be sure, I downloaded the latest version and upgraded. But there have >> been no more changes in the meantime. Connection tool still does not >> behave as expected. I have tried with a couple of different databases an >> users. >> >> On a closer inspection only the field "Uername" fails. "Database" seems >> to be filled correctly. So, something has definitely changed, but half >> the fix does not seem to work as expected. >> >> Steps to reproduce: >> - Open query tool >> - Select<new connetion> from the connection tool --> popup "Connect >> to Server" appears, "Server", "Database", "User" are filled with current >> values. >> - Pick a new server --> new values are filled in for database and user. >> "Database" behaves as expected: identical name as in current >> connection if available on the new server. >> "Username" fails, however. Although a user of the same name is >> available, some other value is filled in. On the first try some >> (seemingly random) username from the list of available users is picked. >> On subsequent tries it is always the first one on the list. > I tried on 1.12.2+ and it just works. Are you sure you have the exact > same user? no odd spaces or invisible characters? I tested once more with two different sets of databases. No odd or invisible characters. Among other: username: "postgres", database: "event" In each set of databases I switched between two almost identical database clusters, the destination being a copy of the source. Results were as described above: the matching database is filled in but the username is lost in translation. Maybe someone else can run a test to add evidence? It's easy: all you need is two databases of the same name (like postgres) which share a user of the same name (like postgres) ... Regards Erwin
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: