FW: pg_xlog on data partition with BBU RAID
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | FW: pg_xlog on data partition with BBU RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D27CB1096EF1C408F4BFAB0046EC7B608C241@ausmailid.aus.pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_xlog on data partition with BBU RAID ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Forwarding to -performance From: Alan Hodgson [mailto:ahodgson@simkin.ca] On Friday 09 June 2006 12:41, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote: > Has anyone actually done any testing on this? Specifically, I'm > wondering if the benefit of adding 2 more drives to a RAID10 outweighs > whatever penalties there are to having pg_xlog on that RAID10 with all > the rest of the data. I have an external array with 1GB of write-back cache, and testing on it before deployment showed no difference under any workload I could generate between having pg_xlog on a separate RAID-1 or having it share a RAID-10 with the default tablespace. I left it on the RAID-10, and it has been fine there. We have a very write-heavy workload. -- "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: