Wrong docs on wal_buffers?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Wrong docs on wal_buffers?
Дата
Msg-id 4D24D7DE.6020507@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Wrong docs on wal_buffers?  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
All,

One of my coworkers just pointed this out:

"The amount of memory used in shared memory for WAL data. The default is
64 kilobytes (64kB). The setting need only be large enough to hold the
amount of WAL data generated by one typical transaction, since the data
is written out to disk at every transaction commit. This parameter can
only be set at server start."
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/runtime-config-wal.html

That's quite incorrect.  The wal_buffers are shared by all concurrent
transactions, so it needs to be sized appropriately for all
*simultaneous* uncommitted transactions, otherwise you'll get
unnecessary flushing.

Certainly performance testing data posted on this list and -hackers.
bears that out.  My suggestion instead:

"The amount of shared memory dedicated to buffering writes to the WAL.
The default is 64 kilobytes (64kB), which is low for a busy production
server.  Users who have high write concurrency, or transactions which
commit individual large data writes, will want to increase it to between
1MB and 16MB. This parameter can only be set at server start."

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Carey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question: BlockSize > 8192 with FusionIO
Следующее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Wrong docs on wal_buffers?