Re: pg_dump --split patch
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump --split patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D22F1C6.1070909@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --split patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 28.12.2010 23:51, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 12/28/2010 04:44 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote: >>> Perhaps abbreviations are to prefer, e.g., myfunc_i, myfunc_i_c, etc >>> to reduce the need of truncating filenames. >> I think that's just horrible. Does the i stand for integer or inet? And >> it will get *really* ugly for type names with spaces in them ... > You think spaces are bad, try slashes ;-) > > Not to mention the need for including schemas in typenames sometimes. > I think you're going to have a real problem trying to fully describe a > function's signature in a file name of reasonable max length. something like funcname_<number-of-arguments>_<hash_of_argument_type_list>.sql seems like a reasonable compromise - you can find the function you are looking for without too much searching, even when overloaded and the uniqueness is still guaranteed. -------------------------------------------- Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: