Re: wCTE behaviour
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wCTE behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D124635.4090706@cs.helsinki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wCTE behaviour (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: wCTE behaviour
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: >> .. and a wild patch appears. >> >> This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without >> CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges >> and >> needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway. > > Is this the patch of record? There are no changes to the documentation > included. I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched it in a very long time. I will work on the documentation if there's a chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1. This arrangement makes more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: