Re: performance libpq vs JDBC
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance libpq vs JDBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D0A02A8.5050206@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance libpq vs JDBC (Werner Scholtes <Werner.Scholtes@heuboe.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: performance libpq vs JDBC
Re: performance libpq vs JDBC |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 16/12/10 09:21, Werner Scholtes wrote: > I assume that the wire protocol of PostgreSQL allows to transmit > multiple rows at once, but libpq doesn't have an interface to access it. > Is that right? Sounds wrong to me. The libpq client is the default reference implementation of the protocol. If there were large efficiencies that could be copied, they would be. Anyway - you don't need to assume what's in the protocol. It's documented here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/protocol.html I'd stick wireshark or some other network analyser on the two sessions - see exactly what is different. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: