Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls

Robert Haas wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:AANLkTimfCQYq4QdKi_ocsJWu_UW8LTnrEd7MGVrk=pBA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><prewrap="">On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Greg Smith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:greg@2ndquadrant.com"><greg@2ndquadrant.com></a>wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre
wrap="">patchI submit.  Doesn't seem worth going through the trouble of committing
 
that minor rework on its own, I'll slip it into the next useful thing that
touches this area I do.  Thanks for the hint, this would work better than
what I did.   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
Well, if I'm the one committing it, I'll pull that part out again and
commit it separately.  Not sure if that affects your calculus, but I
much prefer patches that don't try to do ancillary things along the
way. </pre></blockquote><br /> I meant that I'd bundle it into the block of time I spend on that, and likely submit
withsomething else that touches the same area.  Obviously the correction patch would be better on its own when being
handedover to a committer.<br /><br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:greg@2ndQuadrant.com">greg@2ndQuadrant.com</a>  Baltimore, MD
 
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.2ndQuadrant.us">www.2ndQuadrant.us</a>
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books">http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books</a>
</pre>