Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
От | Mladen Gogala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CFE9777.50406@vmsinfo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows (Tom Polak <tom@rockfordarearealtors.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Polak wrote: > > We are in the process of deciding on how to proceed on a database > upgrade. We currently have MS SQL 2000 running on Windows 2003 (on my > test server). I was shocked at the cost for MS SQL 2008 R2 for a new > server (2 CPU license). I started comparing DB’s and came across > postgresql. It seemed to be exactly what I was after. All of our > programming is in ASP.net. Since I am running MSSQL 2000 I have no > benefit for .Net integration, so it is not a concern. > > > > I ran a head to head test of MS SQL 2000 and Postgresql 9.0. Both are > running on Windows 2003. What I found was quite surprising and I am > wondering if anyone can point out what is going on here. > Here is the test I ran. > I created 2 tables, the main table had 5 fields with a serial ID > field. The second table linked to table 1 for a state field. > > I had ASP.net via MSSQL create 1,000 records in the main table. Took > 9.85 seconds to complete. > Next I had ASP.net via Postgresql create 1,000 records. Took .65625 > seconds. > Postgresql smoked MS SQL server on that test. > > > > Next test is to use ASP.net and join all 1,000 rows with table 2 and > then display the text out. > > MS SQL took 0.76 seconds to display > select name,address,city,state,statename,stateid,other from pgtemp1 > left join pgtemp2 on state=stateid > > > > Then I did the same test via Postgresql and it took 8.85 seconds! I > tried it again as I thought I did something wrong. I did a few tweaks > such as increasing the shared buffers. Still the best I could get it > to was 7.5 seconds. This is insanely slow compared to MSSQL 2000. > What am I missing. Here is my SQL statement for postgresql: > select name,address,city,state,statename,stateid,other from pgtemp1 > left join pgtemp2 on state=stateid > > > > Any ideas on why the Postgres server is soooo much slower on the > joins? I am trying to understand what is going on here so please > don’t flame me. Any advice is appreciated. > > > > > > Are all structures the same? Are all indexes the same? What does "explain analyze" tell you? -- Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA 1500 Broadway New York, NY 10036 (212) 329-5251 http://www.vmsinfo.com The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: