Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael C Rosenstein
Тема Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Дата
Msg-id 4CFE413B.2050907@mdibl.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-general
I won't press the issue for Postgres any further, but I will attest that
synonyms work quite elegantly in Oracle, provide valuable functionality,
and do not generally sow confusion among skilled developers.  It sounds
like the proposed "synonym" feature for Postgres perhaps had a different
intention than I assumed, however, especially due to the differences
between the Oracle and PG viz. how "users," "schemas" and "databases" work.

Thanks.

/mcr


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Daniel Verite"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Следующее
От: Michael C Rosenstein
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?