Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CFD401A.1050408@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Do we want SYNONYMS? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/6/2010 1:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hey -general, > > Command Prompt is currently considering writing a patch to provide > synonyms to PostgreSQL. Is this something the community is interested > in? Do we have use cases for it? MSSQL, DB2 and Oracle support them. > > Reference thread: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg02043.php > > Joshua D. Drake I dont understand the need for it. Dont view's do the exact same thing (plus even more)? What does a synonym offer that a view does not? And perusing the thread, I see it might cause all name and operator lookups to be slower? (I didnt read all of it though) I'm gonna have to go: -1 -Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: