Re: an enhancement idea
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: an enhancement idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CFC03DF.70606@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: an enhancement idea (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
>>> If you want that level of isolation, you have to give each user his own >>> cluster. >> as postgresql is currently structured, yes, and further, each cluster >> needs its own listener port which is, IMHO, rather ugly. > The amount of work needed to get rid of that small bit of ugliness seems > far out of proportion to the value. With the current architecture, you would need to develop service management that could potentially handle 100s of clusters, in a shared web host sort of environment. I sure wouldn't want to have to manage 100s of sysV /etc/rc3.d kinda services to launch all these postmasters, ugh. As I'm envisioning it, the user management would be in the master cluster, child cluster/instances would not have their own users. yeah, I suppose this is pointless. ah well, after a couple beers last night, it seemed like a fantastic idea :D
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: