Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CF91D92.6060606@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/03/2010 11:23 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> I think Josh Berkus' comments in the thread you mentioned are correct: >> >>> Actually, I'd say that there's a broad set of cases of people who want >>> to do a parallel pg_dump while their system is active. Parallel pg_dump >>> on a stopped system will help some people (for migration, particularly) >>> but parallel pg_dump with snapshot cloning will help a lot more people. > But you failed to quote the rest of what he said: > >> So: if parallel dump in single-user mode is what you can get done, then >> do it. We can always improve it later, and we have to start somewhere. >> But we will eventually need parallel pg_dump on active systems, and >> that should remain on the TODO list. Right, and the reason I don't think that's right is that it seems to me like a serious potential footgun. But in any case, the reason I quoted Josh was in answer to a different point, namely Tom's statement about the limited potential uses. cheers andre
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: