Le 03/12/2010 15:17, Michael Shapiro a écrit :
> The document http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/VACUUM_FULL says:
>
> VACUUM FULL, unlike VACUUM, tuples data that has not been deleted, moving it
> into spaces earlier in the file that have been freed. Once it's created a
> free space at the end of the file, it truncates the file so that the OS
> knows that space is free and may be reused for other things. Moving in-use
> data around this way has some major downsides and side-effects, especially
> the way VACUUM FULL does it. There are better ways to free space if you need
> to and better ways to optimize tables (see below) so *you should essentially
> never use VACUUM FULL*.
>
>
> PgAdmin does not give the user a comparable warning when it goes to execute
> a VACCUM FULL. Given the potential problems with the FULL option, would it
> make sense for PgAdmin to issue a warning to this effect?
>
I'm not sure this is the role of pgAdmin to warn people they are doing
potentially stupid things.
--
Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com