Re: fsm and vacuum
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsm and vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CF90A6A.5050705@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fsm and vacuum (Michael Shapiro <mshapiro51@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fsm and vacuum
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
Le 03/12/2010 15:17, Michael Shapiro a écrit : > The document http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/VACUUM_FULL says: > > VACUUM FULL, unlike VACUUM, tuples data that has not been deleted, moving it > into spaces earlier in the file that have been freed. Once it's created a > free space at the end of the file, it truncates the file so that the OS > knows that space is free and may be reused for other things. Moving in-use > data around this way has some major downsides and side-effects, especially > the way VACUUM FULL does it. There are better ways to free space if you need > to and better ways to optimize tables (see below) so *you should essentially > never use VACUUM FULL*. > > > PgAdmin does not give the user a comparable warning when it goes to execute > a VACCUM FULL. Given the potential problems with the FULL option, would it > make sense for PgAdmin to issue a warning to this effect? > I'm not sure this is the role of pgAdmin to warn people they are doing potentially stupid things. -- Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: